Analyzing Primary Sources Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Analyzing direct Sources - Essay ExampleSecond, primary sources are biased by the personal views of the narrator and may lack objectivity and neutrality. This is unavoidable, not because people accommodate bad intentions but because humans are subjective. Our personal views and observations disregard be influenced by our ethical and moral standards and intentions, which can and do change the way we recount instances.Third, primary sources vary in quality, so not all have equal credibility. Some people are more observant and notice details others do not, while others notice more details than are objectively evident and necessary. Examples are the tabun article writers obvious stand against slavery shown in the harsh comments against the slave buyers and Sadies more credible cheery disposition in Shorrow.Lastly, primary sources vary in degrees of reliability. Narrations close to the date and place of the events would be more reliable because personal experience shows that human me mory fades over time. Primary sources need to be checked against other sources on the same event to establish truthfulness and credibility.Offhand, none of the documents is completely unthinkable because each one is base on firsthand accounts. ... Knowing all these, historians should practice critical analysis when studying primary sources.Was any document completely believable, or completely unbelievable Offhand, none of the documents is completely unbelievable because each one is based on firsthand accounts. Unless we can prove the person identified never existed, or the event recounted never took place (e.g., the sale of slaves in Savannah on March 2-3, 1859 as in Georgia), these primary sources should be given the benefit of the doubt.However, we can also state that none of the documents is completely believable for similar reasons until we can establish the actual existence of characters (of Mrs. Hawkes who wrote Shorrow, the Holt family in Walton County who owned the slaves, etc.), of minor details (was on that point a Senator John Hill from Madison, Georgia who served two terms on the Whig ticket as in Evans), and of events (Mrs. Brice closing her school in June 1861 in Freedmen). whole facts need cross-checking to definitely establish each documents credibility.Some sources seemed less believable, notably Freedmen because of its pompous and exaggerated tone, and Georgia because the author sounded like someone vehemently against slavery, freehand these articles their biased tone. The others were more believable because they sounded like a recording, the characters in Bowers, Shorrow, and Evans speaking in a way that is verified by my personal experience.The documents provided a good range of information about slavery in the U.S., from the harsh and cruel to the gentle and kind. While some slaves really suffered at the hands of their masters (Freedmen and Georgia), others enjoyed working and were treated well (Shorrow, Bowers, and Evans).The slaves ambitions